Richard A. Jaffe

Publication Details

  • A POOR CORRELATION EXISTS BETWEEN OSCILLOMETRIC AND RADIAL ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AS MEASURED BY THE PHILIPS MP90 MONITOR JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING Mireles, S. A., Jaffe, R. A., Drover, D. R., Brock-Utne, J. G. 2009; 23 (3): 169-174

    Abstract:

    In anesthesia and critical care, invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is the gold standard against which other methods of monitoring are compared. In this assessment of the Philips MP90 monitor, the objective was to determine whether or not oscillometric measurements were within the accuracy standards set by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS). Three hundred and one invasive and noninvasive paired measurements were obtained from eleven adult patients on the neurosurgical service at Stanford University Medical Center. Bland-Altman plots were created to assess agreement between the two measurement systems. Paired correlation analysis, bias and precision calculations were performed. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements correlated with arterial measurements yielding Pearson r values of 0.68, 0.67 and 0.62 for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively (P < 0.01.) Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were -3.8 mmHg +/- 13.6, -2.4 mmHg +/- 10.0, and 4.0 mmHg +/- 13.1 for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively. The mean difference for these measurements was

    View details for DOI 10.1007/s10877-009-9178-8

    View details for Web of Science ID 000208150900006

    View details for PubMedID 19396553

Stanford Medicine Resources:

Footer Links: