Mark Hlatky, MD

Publication Details

  • CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND THERAPEUTIC DECISION-MAKING JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY Hlatky, M. A., Califf, R. M., Harrell, F. E., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Muhlbaier, L. H., Pryor, D. B. 1990; 15 (1): 1-14


    Clinical decision making is under increased scrutiny due to concerns about the cost and quality of medical care. Variability in physician decision making is common, in part because of deficiencies in the knowledge base, but also due to the difference in physicians' approaches to clinical problem solving. Evaluation of patient prognosis is a critical factor in the selection of therapy, and careful attention to methodology is essential to provide reliable information. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the most solid basis for the establishment of broad therapeutic principles. Because randomized studies cannot be performed to address every question, observational studies will continue to play a complementary role in the evaluation of therapy. Randomized studies in progress, meta analyses of existing data, and increased use of administrative and collaborative clinical data bases will improve the knowledge base for decision making in the future.

    View details for Web of Science ID A1990CH62200001

    View details for PubMedID 2136872

Stanford Medicine Resources:

Footer Links: